Skip to main content

Massive dose of hypocrisy

I got this from my brokerage firm this morning:

MarketWatch News
Google Inc GOOG:NASDAQ
Lawmakers want closer look at Google, DoubleClick merger
MarketWatch
4:22 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- A group of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives called Tuesday for a hearing on Google Inc.'s planned merger with DoubleClick, to extend a public inquiry that has included a related Senate committee hearing in September.

A dozen House members including Rep. Dennis Hastert, Rep. Charles Pickering and Rep. Cliff Stearns sent a letter to Bobby Rush, a Democrat and chairman of the subcommittee on commerce, trade and consumer protection, calling for a "rigorous examination" of privacy issues related to the planned merger, "as soon as practicable."

Rush had originally called for such a hearing in July.

The Republican House members said the hearing is needed to examine the "enormous privacy implications" related to combining Google's database of users' search queries with DoubleClick's "online user behavioral profile" database.

In a contentious Senate Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust, competition policy and consumer rights hearing a little more than one month ago, Google chief legal officer David Drummond defended the proposed $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick, arguing that the two companies are complementary, rather than direct comp etitors.

Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith, also testifying at the hearing, countered that the deal would unfairly grant Google a dominant position in the online advertising industry.

In their letter Tuesday, Republican lawmakers complained that "more questions arose than were answered" during the Senate subcommittee hearing regarding privacy issues.

Microsoft has vigorously campaigned against Google's acquisition of DoubleClick since the deal was first announced in April.

Meanwhile, Microsoft has sealed its own, related acquisition, paying $6 billion for online advertising specialist aQuantive.

[Bold mine.]

What sheer balls.

First, the very notion that Republicans -- the party that brought you domestic spying and the piking of FISA -- are worried about privacy.

Second, Microsoft, the company that has dominated desktops across this country for over a decade -- worried about market domination.

There aren't even words for this kind of chutzpah.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Liveblogged: U.S. vs. Libby -- A primer

As FireDogLake's liveblogging of Libby's trial continues, I note a number of abbreviations, acronyms, slang, shorthand popping up on the fly that most of us Plame-maniacs already know but newbies may not grasp. I'm going to try to document them here, a kind of not-so-secret decoder ring. If there's something you'd like to see added, leave me a comment and I'll cover it here. NOTE: in the event of a server crash at FireDogLake.com, check Windcatpond for announcements, as well as DailyKos for alternative live blogging posts. Complete list of FireDogLake's Libby trial live blog and related posts her e. Acronyms and Abbreviations: "ADD" From notes introduced during testimony by David Addington; abbreviation referred to Addington himself. ADDOPS ? -- Believe to be “Asst. Deputy Director Operations”-CIA (if you can confirm this one, leave me a comment, tks!) CIPA ...

Veep in deep

The Veep "accidentally" shoots a fellow hunter. From here on there is absolutely nothing good about this story. It stinks like curdled milk and three-day-old fish on a summer's day in Dallas. How do we even begin to count the ways in which this reeks? The 22-hour gap: WTF? There's absolutely no excuse for this, we can all agree on this point. But why? Was a key person in this story under the influence of a substance that would take a day to clear? Were they trying to get their stories straight? Heck, could they not come up with a story? Or was the victim not in the clear for that long? The "group" of hunters: Why did it take even longer than the 22-hour gap to identify the third hunter? Why is the media repeatedly using the word "group" to describe two people (Dick Cheney and Pamela Willemore)? The composition of the party: A divorcee ranch owner. An older man who does not appear to be married at this time. A woman sans spouse....

A passing thought

It's been awfully quiet here in this new blog. I miss my Salon peeps stopping by whenever I posted in my old blog. Had a passing thought, though, while contemplating this new-found quietude: maybe the trolls won't find me here. [Sigh] There are tradeoffs for everything.