Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Pearl Harbor Massacre: the White House link to the dismissal of U.S. Attorneys
From the WaPo article:
The Gonzales aide in charge of the dismissals — his chief of staff, D. Kyle Sampson — resigned yesterday, officials said, after acknowledging that he did not tell Justice officials about the extent of his communications with the White House, leading them to provide incomplete information to Congress.
Doesn’t that smell of firewalling and plausible deniability to you?
Kyle Sampson was named U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' chief of staff in September of 2005, three months before the dismissals of the U.S. Attorneys (USA's)
Sampson had been named Deputy Chief of Staff and Counselor to the Attorney General in February 2005; is this part of normal transition post-election?
D. Kyle Sampson has served at the Department of Justice as a Counselor to the Attorney General since 2003, and he currently serves as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia. Prior to joining the Department, Sampson served in the White House as Associate Counsel to the President and as Special Assistant to the President and Associate Director for Presidential Personnel. From 1999 to 2001, Sampson served as Counsel to Senator Orrin G. Hatch on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and he taught as an Adjunct Professor at George Mason University Law School during the 2000-2001 school year. Before entering public service, Sampson practiced law at the Salt Lake City law firm of Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & Loveless and clerked for Judge Karen J. Williams of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Sampson earned his law degree, with honors, from the University of Chicago Law School, where he served as Articles Editor of the University of Chicago Law Review. He earned his undergraduate degree from Brigham Young University.
Bold mine — sure looks to me like cross-pollination from the White House pool to the DOJ. Was Sampson the DOJ’s “political officer”?
Good God, there is so much smoke here, must be a fire.
WaPo's John Solomon is one of the two bylines on this WaPo (Dan Eggen being the other) — can you say “partisan hack”? If it looks this bad posted by a shill, imagine how REALLY BAD it is in actuality. Can only guess at what will come at the end of the week in the Friday news dump…
Another article from early 2005 reads like a cast of our future overlords, I know I got gooseflesh seeing Tasia Scolinos’ name in there. Gack!! Everything about Gonzales’ team was political; the DOJ under his leadership has NEVER been about crime, only the appearance of fighting it, a Potemkin village of polizei.
Dan Eggen was the sole byline on that previous piece from 2005; it leads me to wonder if Solomon was assigned to him on this latest piece as his “minder”?
Here’s another WaPo piece from 2005 that frightens the hell out of me. Scroll down, when you see Rove, you’ll find the article. Holy crap; Sampson truly is Karl Rove's "Mini-me," not just the heir apparent to Rove's role as political hit man.
Both stories in the NYT and WaPo hich 2004 Congressional races were still in question by the end of January/early February?
That might give us a few clues as to which ones were targeted…haven’t yet looked at that.
The whole right-wing talking point about Clinton getting rid of ALL 93 prosecutors is a load of bullsh*t too; Black in the Marianas was a BushI appointee. I suspect now after reading this latest WaPo article that the “Clinton Did It” spin was innoculation.
That’s a wrap on that, you can mark me as having ID’d this. I didn’t know it was Rover who launched that talking point in the flesh.
He handled the innoculation himself, in public; that can only be a sign of utter desperation that he can't trust this to be handed off to someone else, or that he had to drop the innoculant immediately before the tidal wave of bad news hit. Rove has lost his prescience, lost his ability to get a serious lead on the news at this point; it's moving must faster than can his whisper campaigns and faxed talking points.
The continuing document dump is going to contain some nasty bits, but THEY knew what was in there, planned for it. I suspect that’s why we see virtually the same coverage from NYT and WaPO on the USA’s right now.
Note this bit from the NYT:
“We would like to execute this on Thursday, Dec. 7,” Mr. Sampson wrote. Because some United States attorneys were still in Washington attending a conference, he planned to postpone telling them they were being fired. He wrote, “We want to wait until they are back home and dispersed to reduce chatter.”
Mr. Sampson predicted that dismissals might stir debate. “Prepare to Withstand Political Upheaval,” he wrote in describing what to expect as a result of the firings. “U.S Attorneys desiring to save their jobs aided by their allies in the political arena as well as the Justice Department community, likely will make efforts to preserve themselves in office. You should expect these efforts to be strenuous.”
Bold mine. Sampson was prepared in December to go down with the ship for these people. He just bought their undying appreciation and a tenure position in their welfare pool. Welcome to the private sector and the consultantocracy, Mr. Sampson.
Specter added that he only looked into how the provision was altered after Feinstein told him about it. As he explained, "I then contacted my very able chief counsel, Michael O'Neill, to find out exactly what had happened. And Mr. O'Neill advised me that the requested change had come from the Department of Justice, that it had been handled by Brett Tolman, who is now the U.S. attorney for Utah, and that the change had been requested by the Department of Justice because there had been difficulty with the replacement of a U.S. attorney in South Dakota." -- from this article at Slate
Ran across this at Wired.
"Since the San Francisco 'secret room' is numbered 3, the implication is that there are at least several more in other cities (Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego are some of the rumored locations), which likely are spread across the U.S.," Klein wrote.
More at Wired.
Thanks for that Wired link; in my risk matrix on the USA's, I have a column for domestic spying exposures, but hadn't filled it out. This will help, especially since I only had SanFran.
scscomp @ 271
reply to Rayne@176
Michigan connection to Enron = Spencer Abraham