Skip to main content

The quality of mercy

The long goodbye has been longer than we ever thought it would be; instead of days or weeks, it's now been over a year since my mother-in-law was admitted to a nursing home.

In hindsight it was naive to think that the suffering would be so short in duration. It was also not apparent at the time that the nursing home into which she'd first been admitted was integral to the condition she was in when I first wrote about her long goodbye.

It was the cost of the facility that changed our perspective about her condition; at $6000 a month for care, she could not stay there overlong. She was moved to a family facility, a setting that was less institutional and more home-like, and at half the cost. Her condition actually improved, buying more time for my father-in-law and mother-in-law to disentangle themselves from each other.

And yet the ultimate challenge remained, one that might have been forced sooner by the institutional facility that the home facility has delayed. At what point does one finally say, "Enough," and begin to reduce the life-prolonging care which only prolongs suffering as well?

For many the question will be asked of them abruptly; they may not fully understand the question at the time, hurting from loss and confused by the suddenness, and yet the question may be very easy to answer. But the question is so much more difficult when a loved one's decline is subtle, difficult to measure. What if organ failure has not started, but is very nearly begun? What if intravenous antibiotics will heal a minor injury, but trip organ failure? Do you refuse or pull antibiotics?

In this case, there will be no recovery. There will be no restoration to wholeness, there will be no guarantees that the antibiotics will even work.

We opt for mercy.

We opt not to turn this poor person, trapped inside a body that will no longer obey their will, trapped in a bed or a chair all day, unable to express their will, confused and no longer able to recognize loved ones or respond to stimulus consistently. We opt not to make this person a pin cushion poked with needles with no assurance but that there will be more opportunities for further poking in the near future.

And although it pains us greatly, we opt to make our final this long goodbye.

One of the biggest frustrations with the so-called pro-life adherents is their inability to deal with this question; everything must be done to prolong life, no matter the quality of that life. There is never a moral hazard perceived, that such protracted efforts might constitute nothing more than prolonged torture.

The quality of mercy never enters into this equation.

What is mercy but having the emotional and spiritual fortitude to end suffering? Is there any virtue in prolonging suffering if it's not yours but that of another who can no longer help themselves?

Is it not our moral obligation not to merely extend life, but to provide mercy, permitting the peace of death to descend rather than perpetuate the harassment of life by being harassment itself?

We all have to answer these questions on our own and with our families. We are giving our answer today. May you have the ability to make your own choices, and when choosing for others, the strength to choose mercy as you deem necessary.


[Cross-posted at Oxdown Gazette. Photo: Lake of the Clouds, Porcupine Mountains, Michigan's Upper Peninsula by wisconsinhiker via Flickr.com]

Comments

isabelita said…
Just happened over here after recognizing your name at Dick Jones's blog. I'm "Mrs. Perils". My nearly 91 year old mother has just started her 7th year of living with us, and I find I am gathering all kinds of narratives and information about the impending end of life. I know it is almost never a pretty thing, death, and have been trying to figure out how I should get prepared for her further decline.
I hope you and your are doing all right.
isabelita said…
Just happened over here after recognizing your name at Dick Jones's blog. I'm "Mrs. Perils". My nearly 91 year old mother has just started her 7th year of living with us, and I find I am gathering all kinds of narratives and information about the impending end of life. I know it is almost never a pretty thing, death, and have been trying to figure out how I should get prepared for her further decline.
I hope you and your are doing all right.
Rayne Today said…
Very glad to have you stop by, give my best to your spouse.

It's really difficult to "prepare" for the end of life; we don't discuss it often enough throughout our lives, and our culture is so death-phobic. But there are basics that should be addressed (and you likely have already). The legal documents are the worst part -- springing power of attorney, health care power of attorney, guardianship and conservatorship, all must be notarized and witnessed properly depending on state law. But there's also the funeral; what does your mother want in the way of a service? Has she cleaned up the odds and ends that will help family she left behind? I struggled with jewelry that had some unknown provenance -- what was valuable, what was sentimental and why, as an example. And family photos.

Wow, that one is huge. Only my MIL knew who was in those photos and what the events were, and now she's gone.

Feel free to drop me another comment any time; all of my friends are now at that age where we're dealing with end of life. We might as well keep each other company and share the load.
isabelita said…
Thank you so much for responding. I would like very much to stay in touch with you.
Mr. Perils says hello. He said you had gotten into political activism, and maybe were still busy with it. I hope it went well.

Popular posts from this blog

Tinkering in progress

Nuts. I tried to post a rather long piece yesterday, attempting to create an expandable post so that only a lead-in appears on the main blog and the body is expanded only on selection of a link. I'm tripping over the auto-formatting that Blogger inserts into posts; it insists on embedding a begin-font tag all over the place, but no closing font tag. It's driving me nuts! I guess I'll have to try using a post template so that the text on all posts is the same unless indicated otherwise, to try and override the default fonting. Bear with me; you might see what looks like an old post appear between here and the previous post. But enough about me -- how are you?

In a bit of a pickle

As I came down the stairs I heard somebody moaning in the general vicinity of the kitchen. Unnhh. Mmmfff. Unh-huh. Mmm-mmm-mmm-unh. What the hell is going on, I wondered? Standing over the kitchen island, eyes closed, murmuring to himself is my spouse. With a half-eaten jar of pickles in his hand. "Oh my God, these are so good." "Good," he said, as if I didn't hear him the first time through the mouthful of pickles. "My mom would have loved these, these are soooo good. What are they?" Just bread and butter pickles. Pickles and peppers from our garden, and some big sweet onions from the farmers' market, with some extra garlic. That was a week ago. He's eaten another jar since then. I don't think I've made enough to make it through the winter, at this rate of consumption. Try them yourself, they're easy to make. But you'd better do it soon if you live in northern climes as hard frosts will take out the rest of the pickle crop over...

Veep in deep

The Veep "accidentally" shoots a fellow hunter. From here on there is absolutely nothing good about this story. It stinks like curdled milk and three-day-old fish on a summer's day in Dallas. How do we even begin to count the ways in which this reeks? The 22-hour gap: WTF? There's absolutely no excuse for this, we can all agree on this point. But why? Was a key person in this story under the influence of a substance that would take a day to clear? Were they trying to get their stories straight? Heck, could they not come up with a story? Or was the victim not in the clear for that long? The "group" of hunters: Why did it take even longer than the 22-hour gap to identify the third hunter? Why is the media repeatedly using the word "group" to describe two people (Dick Cheney and Pamela Willemore)? The composition of the party: A divorcee ranch owner. An older man who does not appear to be married at this time. A woman sans spouse....