Skip to main content

Squeeze play in progress? Sen. Carl Levin subpoenas Goldman Sachs

Photo of a mortgage fraud victim's home by °Florian via Flickr.

Methinks I see a squeeze play in the making, that President Obama's
"stern talking to" could have been a warning shot from a different direction while Congress works from another.

DailyKos diarist Badabing
posted this morning that Sen. Carl Levin, chair of the Senate Permanent Committee on Investigations, has subpoenaed Goldman Sachs, Washington Mutual and more financial industry firms with regards to the financial meltdown. Note this key graf from WSJ excerpted in the DKos diary:


According to people familiar with the matter, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations also has issued a subpoena to Washington Mutual Inc., a Seattle thrift that was seized by regulators in last year's financial crisis and is now largely owned by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. It appears likely that several other financial institutions also have received subpoenas. Subcommittee investigators declined to comment. A Goldman Sachs spokesman declined to comment on the subpoena. Deutsche Bank didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.


Huh. Isn't that interesting?

Especially when one considers that then Sen. Obama was a co-sponsor of legislation along with Sen. Levin on corporate transparency, also cited in the same DKos post.

Perhaps Levin is going to finally make some traction with the hope of getting a DOJ referral after other attempts to reveal the criminality of subprime lenders and their aides and abettors further upstream in the financial industry. He's got better political headwinds this time, and a former fellow senator in the White House.

Goodness knows CBS' 60 Minutes' Steve Kroft and Scott Pelley tried to explain the problems in clear terms over the last year, but nobody in Congress or law enforcement picked up on it. (See below the list of 60 Minutes' programs which featured all related stories on mortgage fraud and the financial instruments up the food chain which were based on the fraud.)

And Elliot Spitzer also tried his hand after
ALL 50 states' attorneys general were quashed by the White House when they tried to go after subprime mortgage fraud. We all know how that turned out after Spitzer called out the White House and Wall Street in his fateful WaPo op-ed, "Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime", published only weeks before another fateful article in the NYT, and weeks before Bear Stearns crashed.

Let's hope Sen. Levin can get the dirt -- it's out there.

======================
House of Cards: how the U.S. sub-prime mortgage meltdown, in which risky loans drove a housing boom that went bust, is now roiling capital markets worldwide (Video, Feb. 26, 2009)

World Of Trouble: Three years before the housing market crash, Paul Bishop says he warned his superiors at World Savings that many of the mortgages they were granting were misleading and predatory. (Video, Feb. 19, 2009) [NOTE: This is the clearest statement of the amount of fraud involved. A must-watch.]

An Invitation To Fraud: Financial editor Jim Grant says that everyone got a cut in the subprime circle and many share the blame for the crisis. (Video, Feb. 9, 2009)

Credit Default Swaps: an examination of the complicated financial instruments known as credit default swaps and the central role they are playing in the unfolding economic crisis.(Video, Oct. 27, 2008)

Wall Street's Shadow Market: a look at some of the arcane Wall Street financial instruments that have magnified the economic crisis. (Video, Oct. 5, 2008)

The U.S. Mortgage Meltdown: report on the U.S. sub-prime mortgage meltdown, in which risky loans drove a housing boom that went bust, and how this crisis is now roiling capital markets worldwide.(Video, May 25, 2008)


[Cross-posted at The Seminal. Photo of a mortgage fraud victim's home by °Florian via Flickr.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Just In Case

 It's been a long time since I used this blog  —  nine years. That's an insanely long time on the internet. What can I say? I've over-invested myself in Twitter accounts. Microblogging suited me well for the last decade, in tandem with the writing and support work I've done at emptywheel. Now it's time to return to my roots. I may be here more frequently, especially if the Twitter sale goes through and is closed on. Just in case I leave Twitter altogether I'm floating this message in a bottle for you. Leave me a comment here if you want to chat, let me know how to contact you back. Catch me in comments over at emptywheel. Contact me on Mastodon at @raynetoday@mstdn.social . Those of you who've known me longer can still reach me by email which hasn't changed since I started this blog. You will NOT find me at Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. Never. You may soon find me at Discord as I'm thinking about opening an account there. Whatever the case, I hop

Liveblogged: U.S. vs. Libby -- A primer

As FireDogLake's liveblogging of Libby's trial continues, I note a number of abbreviations, acronyms, slang, shorthand popping up on the fly that most of us Plame-maniacs already know but newbies may not grasp. I'm going to try to document them here, a kind of not-so-secret decoder ring. If there's something you'd like to see added, leave me a comment and I'll cover it here. NOTE: in the event of a server crash at FireDogLake.com, check Windcatpond for announcements, as well as DailyKos for alternative live blogging posts. Complete list of FireDogLake's Libby trial live blog and related posts her e. Acronyms and Abbreviations: "ADD" From notes introduced during testimony by David Addington; abbreviation referred to Addington himself. ADDOPS ? -- Believe to be “Asst. Deputy Director Operations”-CIA (if you can confirm this one, leave me a comment, tks!) CIPA

Veep in deep

The Veep "accidentally" shoots a fellow hunter. From here on there is absolutely nothing good about this story. It stinks like curdled milk and three-day-old fish on a summer's day in Dallas. How do we even begin to count the ways in which this reeks? The 22-hour gap: WTF? There's absolutely no excuse for this, we can all agree on this point. But why? Was a key person in this story under the influence of a substance that would take a day to clear? Were they trying to get their stories straight? Heck, could they not come up with a story? Or was the victim not in the clear for that long? The "group" of hunters: Why did it take even longer than the 22-hour gap to identify the third hunter? Why is the media repeatedly using the word "group" to describe two people (Dick Cheney and Pamela Willemore)? The composition of the party: A divorcee ranch owner. An older man who does not appear to be married at this time. A woman sans spouse.