Skip to main content

Damned DINOs

What's it take to be a Democrat these days?

Does one simply have to show up to earn a (D) after their name?

The scores say they're a Dem, but they don't vote like it when it really counts. Byrd, Conrad, Johnson, Landrieu score better than 70% as Dems, but failed miserably when it came to the Alito vote this week.

What will they do when the budget comes before them, clogged up with more Republican pork? will they vote against it?

Their track records suggest they will, but each vote should be viewed with increasing skepticism when they can't vote as real progressives when it truly counts.

I don't personally believe that an overall trackrecord is enough; there are extenuating circumstances that can make any vote substantively different from previous votes. Byrd, for example, is running for office and now has a well-funded opponent; did he sell out on the Alito vote to play to the moderate base? Or is he simply slipping? He says he believes Alito, takes him at his word; I find it hard it hard to believe that Alito, who can cite verse and chapter from thirty-plus years of judicial decisions before circuit and Supreme courts, would have forgotten the details of his membership in a racist and misogynist club like CAP.

Or Landrieu, whose state was devastated by Katrina...did she think by voting with the Republican Party that she'd do better by her state? I want to shake her out of her naivete; if Trent Lott and Haley Barbour weren't able to get FEMA to do better by their state, why the hell would anything Landrieu does to curry favor make any difference now? That ship sailed. Without her. (She's got plenty of work to do on her environmental protection scores, too; this is NOT what Louisiana needs to build a future offering greater protections against hurricanes.)

I don't know what to make of Conrad and Johnson, particularly since their overall scores are better than Byrd's or Landrieu's. I know of no extenuating circumstances in South and North Dakota that would influence their votes, other than their bases may be more centrist. But Alito represented a clear threat to the working people and farmers of their states, a clear threat to the libertarians who live in these two states; it's hard to imagine why they voted as they did.

We have a lot of work to do, no matter the reason. We need to find a way to make it clear that being a Democrat means more than voting like one most of the time. It means taking a stand for Democratic and democratic principles, 7x24x365, 100% of the time, every vote.

Comments

Art Jacobson said…
Dear Rayne,

I just tumbled to the fact that you'd moved to Blogger. First, I'm glad you're back. Second, I think you'll find blogger so much easier to use that you won't miss Radio.

Incidentally, you can save time changing your "look" by starting with one of the templates.

'gards,
Art
The Data Port
Rayne Today said…
Hey Art!!! So glad to have you drop by!! Yeah, the desktop is still out to lunch, holding my Radio software hostage. Until I can get the desktop back up and running, I figured I should have a plan B and blog. I think I've worked out many of the bugs now with the template, also managed to port over most of my legacy stuff from Radio. Just need to get better acquainted with Blogger and clean house now that I've got a "cottage" I've moved into for the time being (including revising the link to your page!).
Phil said…
Hi, Rayne, got here via Dick Jones' link. I'll update my blogroll.

We have a good news/bad news scenario here in Washington. Maria Cantwell voted for cloture, but against Alito's nomination, tip-toeing on the safe side of both streets. She's fairly well-financed, but facing what I believe will be a formidable challenge this fall from the former CEO of Safeco Insurance. My insurance company, dammit!

Also, I think there's a switch you can set so I can reference my Perils blog when I comment instead of my faux Blogspot one, which I set up solely to be able to harass my wife's Blogspot blog.
Rayne Today said…
Hey Phil -- yeah, the Cantwell situation is nasty. The REAL vote wasn't the nomination but the cloture; all of the Dems who voted for cloture are going to be under fire. There will be money ponied up to replace her. And there will be enormous fall out against NARAL, too, for similar reasons; they supported a so-called pro-choice Republican who did not vote in line with NARAL when it counted, and NARAL has responded very poorly to this situation. You can read about it all at FireDogLake (see link under Unwashed Rabble). Very messy stuff ahead, having to clean house of both DINO's and activist organizations that failed.

Glad to see you made it here, thanks for dropping in! I don't know about a "switch", still trying to get my sealegs here. I've linked your Radio blog in the blogroll...? Would like to figure out how to reproduce "categories" like we have in Radio. Only know enough HTML to be dangerous, though.

Popular posts from this blog

Liveblogged: U.S. vs. Libby -- A primer

As FireDogLake's liveblogging of Libby's trial continues, I note a number of abbreviations, acronyms, slang, shorthand popping up on the fly that most of us Plame-maniacs already know but newbies may not grasp. I'm going to try to document them here, a kind of not-so-secret decoder ring. If there's something you'd like to see added, leave me a comment and I'll cover it here. NOTE: in the event of a server crash at FireDogLake.com, check Windcatpond for announcements, as well as DailyKos for alternative live blogging posts. Complete list of FireDogLake's Libby trial live blog and related posts her e. Acronyms and Abbreviations: "ADD" From notes introduced during testimony by David Addington; abbreviation referred to Addington himself. ADDOPS ? -- Believe to be “Asst. Deputy Director Operations”-CIA (if you can confirm this one, leave me a comment, tks!) CIPA

Just In Case

 It's been a long time since I used this blog  —  nine years. That's an insanely long time on the internet. What can I say? I've over-invested myself in Twitter accounts. Microblogging suited me well for the last decade, in tandem with the writing and support work I've done at emptywheel. Now it's time to return to my roots. I may be here more frequently, especially if the Twitter sale goes through and is closed on. Just in case I leave Twitter altogether I'm floating this message in a bottle for you. Leave me a comment here if you want to chat, let me know how to contact you back. Catch me in comments over at emptywheel. Contact me on Mastodon at @raynetoday@mstdn.social . Those of you who've known me longer can still reach me by email which hasn't changed since I started this blog. You will NOT find me at Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. Never. You may soon find me at Discord as I'm thinking about opening an account there. Whatever the case, I hop

Veep in deep

The Veep "accidentally" shoots a fellow hunter. From here on there is absolutely nothing good about this story. It stinks like curdled milk and three-day-old fish on a summer's day in Dallas. How do we even begin to count the ways in which this reeks? The 22-hour gap: WTF? There's absolutely no excuse for this, we can all agree on this point. But why? Was a key person in this story under the influence of a substance that would take a day to clear? Were they trying to get their stories straight? Heck, could they not come up with a story? Or was the victim not in the clear for that long? The "group" of hunters: Why did it take even longer than the 22-hour gap to identify the third hunter? Why is the media repeatedly using the word "group" to describe two people (Dick Cheney and Pamela Willemore)? The composition of the party: A divorcee ranch owner. An older man who does not appear to be married at this time. A woman sans spouse.